” The children don’t live there anymore…”

Gazetteer has a great story going on today, regarding a BC Housing complex called Little Mountain. It seems the people were all re-located and moved, regardless of what lives,connections and friendships they may have established in their community.

The building is all boarded up and remains empty.

WHY, you ask?

Since I could not  possibly do the story justice, you’ll have to go over and read it , in all it’s vomit-inducing detail , at Gazetteers:

If  you happen to be on the election trail today,  could you please ask Gordon Campbell what is going here?


They say that everything old is new again, and this press release from June 2008 is no different. How so?

Run of the River projects have been big election topics  for both parties, but for vastly different reasons.

The BC  Liberals would have you believe that run of the river power projects  are a greener alternative to massive hydro projects like dams.

The NDP are calling for a moratorium on all projects until public consultation takes place. 

Read this press release , then read the link to a recent news story that addresses the same issues.  Then I urge you to find out more and decide where you stand on this issue, because the future of our province is at stake – not only for us, but for generations to come.

Utility seeking to capitalize on BC energy oversupply cites environmental problems
 June 26, 2008

Burnaby, BC – A major California utility that is seeking ways to exploit BC’s projected oversupply of electricity says that Run of River hydro projects do not conform to California’s environmental standards and thus make purchases uneconomical.

The report, entitled “BC Renewable Study Phase 1,” was written for the Pacific Gas and Electricity Company (PGE), based in San Francisco. The report was obtained by the Canadian Office and Professional Employees Union, Local 378 (COPE 378), which represents workers throughout the BC utility sector.

“It is a shame that the people of BC have to hear from an energy company in California that run of river generation is not green, not sustainable, and not economical,” said Andy Ross, President of COPE 378. “Unfortunately, the BC government seems content to hide behind its green veneer and hope that no one in BC notices how destructive and unnecessary this type of development is,” said Ross.

The PGE study examines the feasibility and options for building a transmission line from BC to California in order to take advantage of an oversupply of electricity resulting from the 2007 BC Energy Policy. The report states, however, that under California environmental laws “BC ROR hydro facilities would not be qualified,” as clean, environmentally-friendly renewable energy because of their significant environmental impacts.

The PGE report cites the large size of run of river dams, the impacts on stream volume, timing, and flow, and the “adverse impact on instream beneficial uses” as the major concerns that would disqualify independent run of river power (IPPs). 

The report bluntly states: “BC ROR Hydro facilities will not meet any of these criteria.”

“Even energy-starved California says that that these projects entail too many negative environmental consequences,” said Ross. “Yet the BC government continues to raise our Hydro rates 24% to pay for this environmentally-damaging surplus that we might not even be able to sell,” added Ross.

“Why exactly are we rushing to generate all of this expensive new power which will result in a surplus that we can’t even sell to our biggest market?” asked Ross. “This energy plan is running on empty.” 

The PGE report offers more proof that the government’s drive to develop private power resources was to create an energy surplus to sell to California.

The Provincial Budget released earlier this year stated that BC Hydro rates will be raised 24.2% over the next three years largely to pay for the rapidly increasing costs of privately-produced power. Furthermore, a report from SFU Economist Dr. Marvin Shaffer explains that the main impetus for the government’s energy policy is to generate a large electricity surplus for export. 

COPE 378 and its flagship Take Back the Power campaign have been calling for a moratorium on private power development to allow a comprehensive review on the cumulative environmental and economic impacts of the proliferation of privately owned and operated run of river projects in BC.

~ http://www.cope378.ca/news/news-release-bc%E2%80%99s-private-hydro-projects-not-green-california-utility


Apr 26, 2009 2:31:00 PM MST
Run of river projects becoming election issue as B.C. readies for May 12 vote (Elxn-River-Power)

By Greg Joyce


VANCOUVER _ Most British Columbians know well the names of the manmade behemoths that straddle their rivers and produce hydroelectricity: the W.A.C. Bennett, Keenleyside, Mica and Revelstoke dams.

There are many more but they”re less obtrusive, less gargantuan.

Those massive dams were all built under varying degrees of controversy, blocking rivers and creating reservoirs, sometimes forcing the relocation of communities.

Still, most British Columbians have preferred hydro power to the alternatives _ nuclear power, or coal, or natural gas….

Read the remainder of this column here: http://www.albertaconstructionmagazine.com/news.asp?ID=1449
 Still not sure what’s going on here ? Need an easy to understand reference to help you  figure it out?

Check out www.saveourrivers.ca 


This is what’s wrong with our “Justice” system

Earlier this year, on March 13th, I blogged about a shooting that had occurred in broad daylight, in a residential cul-de-sac where children play freely.

Some men were arguing in front of one of the homes. The verbal disagreement became a physical fight and at that time another man puled out a gun and shot another man in the back ,paralyzing him permanently from the waist down. 

 My account of the aftermath is here.  http://lailayuile.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/bullets-tear-through-residential-cul-de-sac-home-to-many-families-with-children/

The man who fired the gun,Jessie Dhinda,  left the scene and in a press release issued  by the RCMP to the public, was described as “armed and dangerous”. Makes sense – he  had, after all, just shot a man in the back and left him critically injured.

Jessie Dhinda was later apprehended by police and charged with two counts of aggravated assault and one charge of discharging a firearm with the intent to wound or disfigure.

This same man, is now back out on our streets, a free man-  as reported  by Dan Ferguson in this excerpt from The Surrey Leader :

” Jaspal “Jessie” Dhindsa of Surrey is back on the street, free on bail while he waits to stand trial for allegedly shooting another man in the back.

A Surrey Provincial Court judge ordered Dhindsa’s release on April 9, court records show.

The 22-year-old  has been ordered to have no contact with two individuals and is banned from possessing firearms.”

 ~ http://www.bclocalnews.com/surrey_area/surreyleader/news/43563192.html

How does this work? You shoot a man in the back and paralyze him, and it’s called assault.  On a busy street with children about.  Clearly endangering the public.

Of course, it makes sense to give him bail. Of course. He’s been out for almost a month, enjoying the sunshine.

Of course that makes sense.

He must  not  be armed and dangerous anymore…