A discussion on rational, progressive ideas for solutions that’s long overdue.

Breaking news this morning that the Saanich school district will be joining the Vancouver school board in defying the provinces balanced budget requirement, to take a stand against ongoing funding cuts.

It’s been a long time coming,in my opinion and I applaud districts taking this firm stand,as the last line of defense between students and the government.

Over the years in Surrey, we’ve seen the district add an extra week to Spring Break to make up a budget  shortfall and extra long weekends throughout the year-moves that have become permanent lost instruction days. We’ve seen cuts to services across the board. We have schools so crowded there are staggered start times and highschool kids are forced to eat sitting on the floors for lack of space.

And that’s just education. Try sitting in the ER at Surrey Memorial or Royal Columbian. Hospitals crowded with patients in the halls. Not enough nurses. Not enough doctors.

Disability bus pass clawback. Adult Education funding was cut. Post Secondary tuition fees have been increased. MSP premiums jacked up again. Hydro rates increased. And just this last weekend the BC government ads running during the Sunday morning news program heralded a province in good shape, with the lowest tax rates and the best place to live.

The fact is for a large percentage of British Columbians, life is not a sunny government paid for campaign ad. We have a child poverty rate to be ashamed of. We have a mental health and addiction crisis on our streets with few resources to even begin to make a dent. Please explain to me if the leaders of this province are doing such a good job,we still have such huge issues and funding cuts in so many sectors?

Because this is what happens when you don’t replace the revenue from slashing taxes across the board when you come into power, as the BC Liberals have done since their first year in office. Low taxes are indeed great…. if a government has an alternative way to bring money into the provincial coffers. But in BC, the reduction in taxes for people like you and I was replaced with higher MSP premiums,higher tuition fee’s and regressive taxation alternatives.

Did anyone really end up ahead with ‘ the lowest taxes ‘? Yes – corporations and high income earners.

We all know LNG is not the goose that laid the golden egg.  Revenue from natural resources makes up a very small percentage of our provincial income now. And the provinces own budget forecast increasing revenues from higher MSP premiums and tuition fees,items that hurt people who can least afford them.

We are smart enough to know there is an imbalance here. We are certainly smart enough to know that ignoring these issues doesn’t make them go away.The costs of not taking care of these social issues is far more than the cost of addressing them. So lets have that discussion.

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives has done some great work on this issue. In 2013 they released a comprehensive report looking at progressive solutions to generate revenue in the province to deal with all these shortfalls and cuts. https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/BC%20Office/2013/01/CCPA-BC-Tax-Options_0.pdf

And while the numbers obviously need tweaking to reflect 2016/2017, this summary presents ideas I think are worth considering for discussion:

Now, while some will no doubt be freaking out ,take a look at the this years BC Budget, page 107 of 144: http://bcbudget.gov.bc.ca/2016/bfp/2016_budget_and_fiscal_plan.pdf


All these corporate subsidies are getting us nowhere on the revenue front. Under this government leadership,we are bringing in more from MSP premiums than from corporate income tax. Almost more than natural gas and other resource revenues. Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this?

Education funding cuts. Disability bus pass clawbacks. A failure to fund MCFD for years.

We have to have this discussion-it is ridiculous for the province to continue to demand cuts and offload costs onto cities and school districts while the premier is taking a top-up from donations to her political party. That influence is, without a doubt, shaping policy in this province.

And I think it’s time to say enough is enough. I would rather see an honest tax than a death by a thousand little cuts,a skill this government has mastered.


***For parents,educators in Surrey (and good advice for other parents in districts facing cuts.)

Sharing this, posted by a local parent and advocate on Facebook:

If you live in Surrey, please read and share with your friends and facebook groups for your neighbourhood.

We need to keep the momentum of Laurae McNally’s motion and the media attention since the motion. In talking with a couple of different politicians (including MLAs), they recommend that everyone email and call as many MLAs and City Councillors as they can. Apparently, each time a letter is written, a file is created and brought forward during their internal meetings, including when MLAs are speaking in the House. Apparently petitions are generally received as ONE person, not as the number that have signed it.

We need to inundate them and the more pressure they receive, the more likely they are to listen. Let’s all try to make as many calls and write as many emails as we can over the next week. The idea behind this is that we are creating loud noise that makes it near impossible for them to do anything but receive emails and phone calls. Even leaving voicemails in the evenings will help.

On each email you send, please also copy the Minister of Finance, Mike de Jong, Minister of Education, Mike Bernier, and Mayor, Linda Hepner.

One other note: Many MLAs and Councillors will ignore if they are copied on an email, so you need to send individual emails.

Linda Hepner: mayor@surrey.ca 604-591-4126
Mike Bernier: educ.minister@gov.bc.ca (250) 387-1977
Mike de Jong: fin.minister@gov.bc.ca (250) 387-3751 and (604) 870-5486
Christy Clark: premier@gov.bc.ca (250) 768-8426 and (250) 387-1715

Councillor TSGill@Surrey.ca (604) 591-4634
Councillor BruceHayne@Surrey.ca (604) 591-4025
Councillor Vera.LeFranc@surrey.ca 604-591-4347
Councillor MMartin@surrey.ca (604) 591-4622
Councillor Mike.Starchuk@surrey.ca 604-591-4346
Councillor HBSteele@Surrey.ca (604) 591-4623
Councillor JAVilleneuve@Surrey.ca (604) 591-4625
Councillor Dave.Woods@surrey.ca 604-591-4349
marvin.hunt.mla@leg.bc.ca (604) 574-5662.
harry.bains.MLA@leg.bc.ca (604) 597-8248
rob.fleming.mla@leg.bc.ca 250-356-5013
sue.hammell.mla@leg.bc.ca (604) 590-5868
bruce.ralston.mla@leg.bc.ca (604) 586-2740
amrik.virk.MLA@leg.bc.ca (250) 952-7623 and (604) 586-3747
peter.fassbender.MLA@leg.bc.ca (604) 501-3227 gordon.hogg.mla@leg.bc.ca (604) 542-3930
Stephanie.Cadieux.MLA@leg.bc.ca (604) 576-3792

Reminder: City Council meeting, May 2nd at 7pm. Come for 5:45pm if you want to hear about land use. (The meetings are held at City Hall in North Surrey)


3 thoughts on “A discussion on rational, progressive ideas for solutions that’s long overdue.

  1. Laila, you mention all the cuts to services and additional fees. But what about the good things? Off loading that bothersome Burke Mountain property, selling burdensome ferries to name a couple. I know, they gave Burke Mountain to some dodgey friends, but just think of all the tax revenue from families when that thing is built out. And I bet if you go to Fiji and explain you’re from BC you’ll get a discount ferry ride. Or maybe not. They might discover how gullible you are and charge you twice!
    I wonder if ALL the Lieberal MLAs get $50,000 car allowances? That should generate a fair bit of tax revenue.
    Keep up the good work.


    1. Oh how silly of me John! And I forgot too, the selling of that ‘surplus’ property in Sullivan,where new schools are desperately needed! I know it was sold for a song and a dance,just to balance the budget, considerate,no? 🙂

      That so many in this government don’t understand why the public, and a public of all leanings I must add, is so outraged over this top-up of the premiers, shows how out of touch they are with most peoples existence.


  2. It might be better if the school boards all walked away from it. They are given all the responsibility but none of the authority. They have to figure it out but the provincial government doesn’t have to do anything. Some school boards and PACS were asking parents this spring which programs they would accept as being cut? Like now they want parents to decide which limb is cut off. School boards need to all resign and let the province take the heat. right now when the cuts come down, the school boards take the heat.

    in Nanaimo they will be cutting school bus routes. parent’s aren’t happy because they fear their children will get hit by cars and truck. In the end the school board will be blamed.

    If school boards all resigned, the blame would be placed where it ought to be> At the door of Christie Clark and the mInisters of uneducation.

    When it comes to education the voters of this province decided it wasn’t important some years ago. when the province stopped adequately funding education people still voted for the B.C. LIeberals. Well, whether you have children or not, education is a big deal. it sets the tone for the future of our province. Perhaps this election we ought to just focus on education. The B.C. Lieberal party does not care about public education for our children. They are more interested in ensuring their political contributions come in regularly.

    The B.C. Lieberals don’t care children go hungry or Surrey schools wouldn’t have to have programs to send home food for kids over the weekend.

    Christy can run all the ads she wants. They are similar to Harper’s. They didn’t help Harper and they may not help Christy. her government is mired in about as much corruption as Harper’s was. skimming off of $20K soirees………….

    500K of us without doctors. Ya, blame the health authorities. All of these authorities and boards are there simply to ensure the government isn’t blamed, but they are the cause of the poverty for children, disabled, and seniors.


Comments are closed.